0%
ClinicalNeurologyNeuropathic Pain

Intrathecal administration of autologous bone marrow stromal cells improves neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury

Science Direct

This study supports the benefit of intrathecal administration of autologous MSCs for the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injuries.

AI generated image for: Intrathecal administration of autologous bone marrow stromal cells improves neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury

This study supports the benefit of intrathecal administration of autologous MSCs for the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injuries.

Research Details

Source

Science Direct

Publication Date
Categories & Tags
ClinicalNeurologyNeuropathic Pain

Cite this article: Science Direct. "Intrathecal administration of autologous bone marrow stromal cells improves neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury". Published August 11, 2025. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304394018300417

Access Original Research

View the complete study and detailed methodology from the original source.

Read Full Study

You Might Also Like

Explore more articles in this category

AI generated image for: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: a phase II trial
2 min

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: a phase II trial

OBJECTIVE To assess in multiple sclerosis (MS) the effect of intense immunosuppression followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (AHSCT) vs mitoxantrone (MTX) on disease activity measured by MRI. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, phase II, randomized trial including patients with secondary progressive or relapsing-remitting MS, with a documented increase in the last year on the Expanded Disability Status Scale, in spite of conventional therapy, and presence of one or more gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) areas. Patients were randomized to receive intense immunosuppression (mobilization with cyclophosphamide and filgrastim, conditioning with carmustine, cytosine-arabinoside, etoposide, melphalan, and anti-thymocyte globulin) followed by AHSCT or MTX 20 mg every month for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the cumulative number of new T2 lesions in the 4 years following randomization. Secondary endpoints were the cumulative number of Gd+ lesions, relapse rate, and disability progression. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Twenty-one patients were randomized and 17 had postbaseline evaluable MRI scans. RESULTS AHSCT reduced by 79% the number of new T2 lesions as compared to MTX (rate ratio 0.21, p = 0.00016). It also reduced Gd+ lesions as well as the annualized relapse rate. No difference was found in the progression of disability. CONCLUSION Intense immunosuppression followed by AHSCT is significantly superior to MTX in reducing MRI activity in severe cases of MS. These results strongly support further phase III studies with primary clinical endpoints.

Neurology