0%
ClinicalWomen's Health

Effects of autologous stem cell therapy for fertility enhancement among women with premature ovarian insufficiency

Slack

Jesmine Banu; Nishat Jahan; Shaheen A. Anwary; Mostafa Tarique; Itrat Aziz; Nastaran Laskar; M. Rifat Hasan; Chowdhury F. Alamgir; Maliha Darmini

nSlZ8N-cCYFF4p6NaelQe.png
Effects of autologous stem cell therapy for fertility enhancement among women with premature ovarian insufficiencyAuthors

Jesmine Banu; Nishat Jahan; Shaheen A. Anwary; Mostafa Tarique; Itrat Aziz; Nastaran Laskar; M. Rifat Hasan; Chowdhury F. Alamgir; Maliha Darmini

Plain‑language summary

This study looked at whether a procedure called autologous stem cell ovarian transplant (ASCOT) can improve ovarian function in women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). POI means the ovaries stop working normally before age 40, which reduces fertility and affects hormones. ASCOT uses a woman’s own stem cells, placed into her ovaries, with the hope of restoring some egg‑making activity.

Key findings: after treatment some women showed measurable improvements in ovarian reserve tests — higher anti‑MĂŒllerian hormone (AMH) and more antral follicles (AFC) — although overall pregnancy was rare (4% after three treatment cycles). Results suggest ASCOT may improve ovarian signals linked to fertility for some patients, but it remains experimental.

Background

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) causes reduced egg supply and changes in hormones like AMH and follicle‑stimulating hormone (FSH). Currently, standard options for women who want children include donor eggs or embryos. Researchers are studying regenerative approaches such as injecting a patient’s own stem cells into the ovary (autologous stem cell therapy) to try to reactivate or support remaining follicles.

Why this matters for stem cell banking: Autologous approaches use a person’s own cells, so having stored autologous stem cell sources (for example, cord blood, cord tissue, or banked adult stem cells) could expand future treatment options for fertility preservation and age‑related ovarian decline.

Methods (what the researchers did)
  • Study type: prospective observational study.
  • Participants: 50 women diagnosed with POI.
  • How POI was defined in the study: very low AMH (<0.5 ng/dl), high FSH (>25 ng/ml), and/or low antral follicle count (AFC <3 in each ovary).
  • Intervention: autologous stem cell ovarian transplant (ASCOT) — the woman’s own stem cells were placed into her ovaries (the article reports outcomes after up to three treatment cycles).
  • Main measurements: AMH (a blood marker that reflects ovarian reserve), FSH (a hormone that rises when the ovaries are underactive), and AFC (number of small visible follicles on ultrasound).
Results (what they found)
  • After the first post‑treatment cycle:
  • Mean AMH increased by 0.48 ± 0.306 (not statistically significant overall).
  • Mean FSH changed by +2.73 ± 3.98 (not a consistent improvement in this early assessment).
  • Mean AFC decreased by 1.33 ± 0.625 (a surprising early drop).
  • After the second cycle:
  • AMH increased by 0.110 ± 0.051 compared with baseline.
  • AFC increased notably by 4.63 ± 1.49.
  • FSH decreased by 7.4 ± 2.78.
  • After the third cycle:
  • AMH increased by 0.82 ± 0.44 (statistically significant compared with baseline).
  • AFC increased (reported changes in follicle counts were statistically significant overall).
  • FSH fell by 2.15 ± 3.625 (the study reports that while FSH tended to decrease, this change was not always statistically significant).
  • Pregnancy outcome: overall pregnancy rate reported was 4% after the third cycle follow‑up.
  • Overall interpretation: ASCOT was associated with measurable improvements in markers of ovarian reserve (AMH and AFC) for some women. Changes in FSH were inconsistent and not clearly significant across all time points. Clinical pregnancy remained uncommon in this group.
What the measurements mean (simple terms)
  • AMH (anti‑MĂŒllerian hormone): a blood test used to estimate how many small egg follicles remain in the ovaries. Higher AMH usually indicates better ovarian reserve.
  • AFC (antral follicle count): number of small follicles seen on ultrasound — another direct sign of how many eggs may be available.
  • FSH (follicle‑stimulating hormone): when the ovary is failing, the body raises FSH; a lower FSH after treatment suggests better ovarian responsiveness.
Practical implications for patients and for stem cell banking
  • ASCOT is promising but still experimental. Some women showed improved ovarian reserve tests after treatment, but actual pregnancies were rare in this study.
  • Autologous therapy uses a woman’s own cells, which reduces the risk of immune rejection. This highlights why storing your own stem cell sources (cord blood/tissue at birth, or other forms of autologous cell banking) may be valuable: future regenerative procedures could rely on those cells.
  • For women concerned about fertility and aging, stem cell–based ovarian treatments could become an option in the future, but more large, controlled trials are needed to confirm benefit and safety.
  • If you are considering fertility preservation, current proven options remain egg or embryo freezing. Discuss experimental options carefully with a fertility specialist and consider participating in regulated clinical trials if eligible.
Limitations noted by the authors
  • The study was observational and relatively small (50 patients).
  • There was variability between patients in responses, and some early post‑treatment measures did not improve consistently.
  • Longer follow‑up and randomized controlled trials are needed to determine real fertility benefits and safety.
Conclusions

Autologous stem cell ovarian transplant (ASCOT) showed encouraging effects on ovarian reserve markers (AMH and AFC) in women with premature ovarian insufficiency, but reductions in FSH were less consistent, and pregnancy rates were low (4% after three cycles). ASCOT may offer a regenerative approach to partially restore ovarian function for some women, but it remains experimental. For people interested in future regenerative fertility options, preserving autologous stem cell sources could expand future choices.

Selected sources and further reading
  • Banu J, Jahan N, Anwary SA, et al. Effects of autologous stem cell therapy for fertility enhancement among women with premature ovarian insufficiency. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20230114
  • Herraiz S, Romeu M, Buigues A, et al. Autologous stem cell ovarian transplantation to increase reproductive potential in patients who are poor responders. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(3):496-505.
  • ESHRE Guideline Group on POI (Webber L, Davies M, Anderson R, et al.). ESHRE Guideline: management of women with premature ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(5):926-37.
  • Na J, Kim GJ. Recent trends in stem cell therapy for premature ovarian insufficiency and its therapeutic potential: a review. J Ovarian Res. 2020;13(1):74.

If you are interested in how stem cell banking could apply to fertility preservation or future regenerative treatments, talk with your fertility clinic or a stem cell banking provider about current options and the types of cells that can be stored for potential future use.

Research Details

Source

Slack

Publication Date
Categories & Tags
ClinicalWomen's Health

Cite this article: Slack. "Effects of autologous stem cell therapy for fertility enhancement among women with premature ovarian insufficiency". Published November 27, 2025. Available at: https://www.ijrcog.org/index.php/ijrcog/article/view/12577

Access Original Research

View the complete study and detailed methodology from the original source.

Read Full Study↗

You Might Also Like

Explore more articles in this category

AI generated image for: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: a phase II trial
2 min

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: a phase II trial

OBJECTIVE To assess in multiple sclerosis (MS) the effect of intense immunosuppression followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (AHSCT) vs mitoxantrone (MTX) on disease activity measured by MRI. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, phase II, randomized trial including patients with secondary progressive or relapsing-remitting MS, with a documented increase in the last year on the Expanded Disability Status Scale, in spite of conventional therapy, and presence of one or more gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) areas. Patients were randomized to receive intense immunosuppression (mobilization with cyclophosphamide and filgrastim, conditioning with carmustine, cytosine-arabinoside, etoposide, melphalan, and anti-thymocyte globulin) followed by AHSCT or MTX 20 mg every month for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the cumulative number of new T2 lesions in the 4 years following randomization. Secondary endpoints were the cumulative number of Gd+ lesions, relapse rate, and disability progression. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Twenty-one patients were randomized and 17 had postbaseline evaluable MRI scans. RESULTS AHSCT reduced by 79% the number of new T2 lesions as compared to MTX (rate ratio 0.21, p = 0.00016). It also reduced Gd+ lesions as well as the annualized relapse rate. No difference was found in the progression of disability. CONCLUSION Intense immunosuppression followed by AHSCT is significantly superior to MTX in reducing MRI activity in severe cases of MS. These results strongly support further phase III studies with primary clinical endpoints.

Neurology